@EMOBCBG said:Sly, Mugabe looks like a devil to you but Zimbabweans need someone who will safeguard their natural resources as their own such as the farms seizeed from the white
<cite>@Sylvester said:</cite>Same old outdated story,how can he protect them. It's so unfortunate that such an old and frail man can manage to convince educated people like you,i would never pay attention to people like Mugabe who have outlived their usefulness,the man has been in power for over 30 years,it's not normal,that's abuse of democracy and you and I know he didn't win clean.Tsvangirai pissed off tose who are meant to help him ie the security Chiefs,those are the ones that ensure the old man returns to power,they do all it takes to ensure that.
<cite>@Sylvester said:</cite>EMO mudala,i was with DJ Werra de Zim last sunday at a BBQ and we briefly touched this subject,he was busy DJ'ing so we didn't finish discussing but from what you are saying and what he said,the problem Zimbabweans have is lack of sharp opposition leaders in Zambia who are able to command respect from the people and oppose and worry Mugabe successfully because the people have lost confidence in Tsvangirai who they believe is a sell out and a womaniser etc and just like in Zambia,it seems the ruling party in Zimbabwe capitalises on the rural vote,those in urban areas are full of apathy and therefore only a minority actually vote,the rest just talk and critize,it is also possible that the ruling govts rigs elections in rural areas because they have the means to touch all places using state machinery whilst the opposition only concentrate in urban areas.I do not care about Mugabe's ideologies,the fact still remains he's overstayed,he's been in power for over 30 years and he's 89 years for crying out loud,you mean there are no better people with fresh ideas to take over from him.The West do not want and cannot want anything in Zimbabwe,they only rose up to defend the former white farmers who were being hacked to death,their farms and other property burnt etc because they refused to share their land. I think the issue could have been resolved better not sending militia to kill and destroy and that's where Mugabe lost it,it's not that the west want to grab Zimbabwe or loot any of it's resources,it was a call for dialogue and justice in order to solve the land issues.
@EMOBCBG said:I get your point, but its hard to intervene in a country for many reasons one of which is:1. when the reason to do so seems stupid....just like in Syria were they know the chemical issue is a solid lie....In Zimbabwe, for any country to intervene, what lie can be put across? when the EU, African and other observer missions say, the elections were free and fair?...even when Mugabe chased those white farmers, was it possible to intervene? even when their last elections had some people axed, it was both the Gov and opposition doing atrocities...Secondly, Zimbabwe is a landlocked country and to intervene militarily, you need approval from surrounding nations and AU...which cant happen...the war can de-stabilize Central and Southern Africa....For Gadaffi, he had a coast around him and near Europe, so it was easy to go in.....
<cite>@Sylvester said:</cite>....was something significantly important in Zim,the western govts would have used Zimbabwe's neighbours by offering them ''goodies'' in form aid etc in order to use their space and attack Zimbabwe and get out Mugabe .....